In which scenario does Tort not pay for permanent impairment benefits?

The scenario in which Tort does not pay for permanent impairment benefits is related to anyone convicted of impaired driving, regardless of fault. This principle stems from legal frameworks that aim to discourage driving under the influence by imposing stricter liabilities on offenders. When a person is convicted of impaired driving, the law often holds them fully accountable for the consequences of their actions. Therefore, they may not be eligible for certain benefits that would otherwise be available to those injured in an accident; this serves as a deterrent against such behavior.

The rationale is that allowing someone who has engaged in wrongdoing, such as impaired driving, to benefit from compensation related to an accident they caused would undermine the legal consequences of their actions. This policy is in place to emphasize personal responsibility and to discourage reckless behavior on the roads.

In contrast, other scenarios might involve individuals who are not guilty of impaired driving or who are not responsible for causing an accident, which would allow for the possibility of receiving permanent impairment benefits, emphasizing the importance of accountability in the legal system.