Is it possible for drivers to have limitations on recovery for pain and suffering in a No Fault system?

Study for the SGI Restricted Auto Basic Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question comes with hints and explanations. Get ready for your test!

In a No Fault insurance system, drivers typically face significant limitations on their ability to recover damages for pain and suffering resulting from accidents. This system is designed to streamline the process of obtaining compensation by removing the need to prove fault in an accident; instead, individuals seek compensation directly from their own insurance companies.

However, the trade-off for this streamlined process is often found in the restrictions placed on claims for non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Many jurisdictions with No Fault laws impose thresholds that must be met before a claimant can pursue compensation for these types of damages. These thresholds can be based on the severity of injuries or the amount of economic loss incurred.

This means that in such systems, while individuals can claim certain damages, including medical expenses and lost wages, the avenues for claiming damages for pain and suffering are notably limited, reinforcing the assertion that drivers indeed have significant limitations on such recovery.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy