True or False: An injured person who sues someone else may also be jointly liable for their injuries.

The correct response indicates that an injured person who sues another can indeed be jointly liable for their injuries. This concept is grounded in the legal principle of comparative fault, which assigns a percentage of fault to all parties involved in an incident that causes injury or damage.

In cases where the injured person's actions contributed to their own injury, the court may determine that they hold some degree of responsibility. For instance, if someone is injured while partially engaging in reckless behavior or ignoring safety protocols, their conduct may be evaluated alongside that of the defendant. As a result, if the court finds that the injured person is partially at fault, their compensation may be reduced based on that percentage of responsibility.

This principle is important in promoting fairness in legal proceedings, as it recognizes that multiple parties can share liability based on their actions in a given situation. Joint liability could also affect how damages are awarded in a lawsuit, encouraging all parties to act responsibly to prevent harm.

Other responses that suggest it may not be true or that it depends on specific conditions miss the broader legal framework where comparative fault often applies. Thus, the assertion that an injured person can be jointly liable for their injuries is accurate within this context.