What can a Tort motorist be sued for in addition to situations mentioned for No Fault motorists?

A Tort motorist can be held liable for pain and suffering of another Tort motorist due to the nature of tort law, which allows for claims that go beyond just economic losses. When a Tort motorist is found at fault for an accident, they can be sued for non-economic damages, which include compensation for emotional and physical pain experienced by the injured party. This is distinct from No Fault laws, where motorists typically cannot claim pain and suffering damages unless specific conditions are met.

In contrast, the other options concern economic-related damages that can also be pursued but are more commonly associated with No Fault systems or are less exclusive to Tort situations. For instance, property damage and economic loss represent tangible damages that can occur in any motor vehicle accident scenario, and they do not encapsulate the broader spectrum of suffering that a Tort motorist might be liable for, particularly when the negligence is established. Loss of income is similarly more related to economic consequences rather than the emotional and psychological ramifications like pain and suffering. Thus, claims regarding pain and suffering bring a unique dimension to the liabilities faced by Tort motorists.